SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC v. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC et al
| SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC |
| AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC, COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE COMPANY and OLD JB LLC |
| 4:2023cv00001 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by OLD JB LLC identifying Corporate Parent American Commercial Barge Line Holding Corp., Other Affiliate Commercial Barge Line Holdings LLC for OLD JB LLC.. (Kelly, Donald)
|
|
Filing 17
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC identifying Corporate Parent American Commercial Barge Line Holding Corp., Other Affiliate Commercial Barge Line Holdings LLC for AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC.. (Kelly, Donald)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC, OLD JB LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Def's Motion for Partial Dismissal of Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A-Change Order, #3 Exhibit B-January 15, 2019 letter, #4 Exhibit C-August 12, 2020 letter, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Donald)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: This cause has come before the Court upon the motion of Kevin A. Imhof of the law firm Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC seeking an Order granting Mark Hurst of the law firm Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC leave to appear pro hac vice for the purposes of representing Plaintiff Sweetwater Marine, LLC f/k/a Ashton Marine, LLC in this proceeding [Dkt. 13.] Mr. Hurst is already admitted to this Court. Therefore, the Motion to appear pro hac vice [dkt. 13] is DENIED AS MOOT. Mr. Hurst is ORDERED to file an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 1/27/2023. Copy mailed per Distribution list. (LF)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear pro hac vice: This case is before the Court on the motion for Andrew Hagerman to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff Sweetwater Marine, LLC [Dkt. 12.] Having considered the Motion, the Court determines it should be GRANTED. Therefore, Andrew Hagerman is granted leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff in this matter. The court FURTHER ORDERS that Andrew Hagerman register as a user of the Court's electronic case filing system by February 10, 2023. Failure to do so could result in the revocation of his admission pro hac vice. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 1/27/2023. Copy mailed per distribution list. (LF)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Attorney(s) Mark Hurst to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7475578), filed by Plaintiff SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Attorney(s) Andrew Hagerman to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7475528), filed by Plaintiff SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT, filed by Plaintiff SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC, re #10 Entry. (Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 10
SECOND ENTRY ON JURISDICTION: As the party asking this Court to invoke its jurisdiction, Plaintiff must properly allege the citizenship of each of the parties to establish subject matter jurisdiction. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Ctrs., Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 758 (7th Cir. 2009); Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc., 985 F.2d 908, 911 (7th Cir. 1993). Therefore, the Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the members of Defendant American Commercial Barge Line, LLC and their citizenship. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/18/2023. (LF)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT, filed by Plaintiff SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC, re #7 Entry, #8 Amended Complaint. (Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED COMPLAINT against AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC, OLD JB LLC, filed by SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC.(Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 7
ENTRY ON JURISDICTION: The Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the members of the LLC parties and their citizenship. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/9/2023. (LF)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF)
|
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE, LLC, COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE COMPANY, OLD JB LLC. (LF)
|
|
Filing 3
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC. (Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Alexander Imhof on behalf of Plaintiff SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC. (Imhof, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by SWEETWATER MARINE, LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number BINSDC-7445252) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Imhof, Kevin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
