FETTER et al v. FETTER et al
| SARA A. FETTER |
| MATTHEW D. FETTER and FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. |
| 4:2023cv00019 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING #20 PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 10- DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM: This matter comes before the Court on an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Answer to Counterclaim [Dkt. 16] filed by the Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, Sara A. Fetter Dynasty QSST Trust U/A October 31, 2018, by and through its Trustee, Sara A. Fetter, and Sara A. Fetter. The Court, being duly advised, hereby GRANTS said Motion. Sara Fetter shall have up to and including April 17, 2023 by which to respond to the Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs' Counterclaim. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 4/9/2023. (LF)
|
|
Filing 20
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to April 17, 2023 in which to #16 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal)Counterclaim , filed by Counter Defendants SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER, Plaintiffs SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vink, Paul)
|
|
Filing 19
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #18 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of Florida , filed by Defendants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Counter Claimants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Matthew Fetter)(Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of Florida, filed by Defendants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Counter Claimants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 17
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KELLIE M. BARR: This case is scheduled for an initial pretrial conference by Zoom on May 8, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), before United States Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. The Court will contact counsel by separate email with information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the Court's expectations for the conference. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/23/2023.(LF)
|
|
Filing 16
Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM against SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER(Trustee of the Sara A. Fetter Dynasty QSST Trust U/A October 31, 2018), filed by FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC., MATTHEW D. FETTER.(Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File: The Court, having reviewed the same and being duly advised as to relevant matters, GRANTS the Motion. Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to and including March 17, 2023. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/2/2023. (LF)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Extension of Time to March 17, 2023 To Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 13
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER(Trustee of the Sara A. Fetter Dynasty QSST Trust U/A October 31, 2018). (Vink, Paul)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Snow on behalf of Defendants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Snow, Peter)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Dorelli on behalf of Defendants MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Dorelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Dakota Christopher Slaughter on behalf of Plaintiffs SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER. (Slaughter, Dakota)
|
|
Filing 9
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by MATTHEW D. FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Seema Ramesh Shah on behalf of Plaintiffs SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER. (Shah, Seema)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Paul D. Vink on behalf of Plaintiffs SARA A. FETTER, SARA A. FETTER. (Vink, Paul)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF)
|
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Filing of State Court Filing of Notice of Removal by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 State Court Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal to Adverse Party and State Court Clerk, #2 Attachment to State Court Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal to Adverse Party and State Court Clerk) (Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 3
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory A. Neibarger on behalf of Defendants MATTHEW FETTER, FIDELITY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.. (Neibarger, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clark County Superior Court 6, case number 10D06-2301-CT-000012, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7500068) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Docket Sheet, Appearance, Complaint, Summons to Mathew Fetter, Summons to Fidelity Automotive, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, and Report of Service of Process, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Neibarger, Gregory)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
