DOUGLAS v. G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC. et al
| TYROME DOUGLAS |
| G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. |
| 4:2023cv00024 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING #17 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC'S SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and Equifax shall file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 19, 2023. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 4/20/2023. (LF)
|
| Filing 17 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to May 19, 2023 in which to #1 Complaint , filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Second Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Betz, Tracy) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC..(Smith, William) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil Peluchette on behalf of Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Peluchette, Neil) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy Nicole Betz on behalf of Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Betz, Tracy) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC'S EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDRED that the motion is granted and Equifax shall file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before April 19, 2023. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/20/2023. (LF)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC.. (Smith, William) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to April 19, 2023 in which to #1 Complaint , filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brock, Steven) |
| Filing 10 Statement (Corporate Disclosure) by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Brock, Steven) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven D. Brock on behalf of Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Brock, Steven) |
| Filing 8 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC.. (Smith, William) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William E. Smith, III on behalf of Defendant G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC.. (Smith, William) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (LF) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., G.L.A. COLLECTION CO., INC., TRANS UNION, LLC. (LF) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Hemminger on behalf of Plaintiff TYROME DOUGLAS. (Hemminger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by TYROME DOUGLAS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7513672) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Hemminger, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
