BROYHILL v. KIJAKAZI
| CHAD BROYHILL |
| Commissioner KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| 4:2023cv00047 |
| March 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: The parties have indicated their consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge at Filing No. 9. It is, therefore, ORDERED that this case be referred to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge, The Honorable Kellie M. Barr, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. The cause number of this action shall be amended as shown above to reflect the referral of this action to the Magistrate Judge. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/6/2023. (LF)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically: This cause has come before the Court upon the motion of Neil H. Good, counsel for Chad Broyhill, for a Refund of Fees Paid Electronically in the above- captioned case. The court being fully advised, it is now ORDERED that the motion be, and hereby is, GRANTED. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/28/2023. (LF)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Appear pro hac vice: This cause has come before the Court upon the motion of Neil H. Good, counsel for Chad Broyhill, for leave to appear and participate pro hac vice in the above- captioned cause only. Being fully advised, it is now ORDERED that the motion be, and hereby is, GRANTED.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/28/2023. (LF)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically , filed by Plaintiff CHAD BROYHILL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Good, Neil) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. (LF) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Administrative Review against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by CHAD BROYHILL. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7561289) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Good, Neil) |
| Filing 1 First MOTION for Attorney(s) Neil H. Good to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7559885), filed by Plaintiff CHAD BROYHILL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Good, Neil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
