CHASE v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES
| Nicholas J Chase and NICHOLAS J. CHASE |
| INC ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES and ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. |
| 4:2023cv00048 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Acknowledged: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. See Order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/17/2023. (LF)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS J. CHASE. (Agnew, J.) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. (LF) Modified on 4/3/2023 (LBT). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Plaintiff Nicholas J Chase. (Agnew, J.) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to Nicholas J Chase. (Agnew, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment, Injunctive Relief, and Damages against Nicholas J Chase, filed by Nicholas J Chase. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7563006) (Agnew, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
