HOUNSHEL v. BADE et al
| ARICK HOUNSHEL |
| OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA and BEDFORD CITY POLICE |
| 4:2023cv00122 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Proposed CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendants OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA and Plaintiff, Arick Hounshel. (Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint Affirmative Defenses and Jury Demand in Lieu of Motion to Dismiss, filed by All Defendants.(Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 16 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Upon Which Relief Can be Granted, and Relief Sought , filed by Defendants OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Upon Which Relief Can be Granted, and Relief Sought, filed by Defendants OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (Glass, Danny) |
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: Zoom Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2023 01:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. The Court will contact counsel by separate email with information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the Court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 8/7/2023.(SWM)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 12 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by BEDFORD CITY POLICE. (Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 11 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Danny E. Glass on behalf of Defendants OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (Glass, Danny) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas H. Bryan on behalf of Defendants OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (Bryan, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service, filed by ARICK HOUNSHEL. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Service on Bedford City Police, #2 Exhibit Service on Canine Officer Bade, #3 Exhibit Service on City of Bedford)(Koch, Glen) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint by ARICK HOUNSHEL. (Callahan, John) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to OFFICER FAHEEM BADE, BEDFORD CITY POLICE, CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA. (LF) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Glen Emmett Koch, II on behalf of Plaintiff ARICK HOUNSHEL. (Koch, Glen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Scott Callahan on behalf of Plaintiff ARICK HOUNSHEL. (Callahan, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ARICK HOUNSHEL. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7730541) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons)(Callahan, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
