Landrith v. Kansas Attorney General et al
| Bret D. Landrith |
| Brian Frost, Craig E. Collins, David Weber, Phyllis Gilmore, Young Williams PC, Rob Siedlecki, Bob Corkins, John Badger, Stanton A. Hazlett, Kansas Attorney General and Don Jordan |
| 2:2012cv02161 |
| March 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Shawnee |
| Carlos Murguia |
| Gerald L. Rushfelt |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's 111 Notice of Objection to Filing Restrictions is OVERRULED. The proposed filing restrictions and procedures set out in the court's 110 Memorandum and Order filed November 30, 2012, are effective as of December 7, 2012, with the limited exception that these filing restrictions shall not in any way affect plaintiff's ability to proceed with the pending appeal of this case to the Tenth Circuit. In addition, the filing restrictions should be modified as shown in Appendix A below to reflect the correct case number of "12-2161-CM" where the case number was incorrectly stated as "12-1261-CM" in the proposed restrictions and to reflect non-substantive minor grammatical c hanges. (Doc. 110 at 11). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT if the Tenth Circuit should later reverse any portion of this court's November 2, 2012 order (Doc. 88) or its November 30, 2012 order (Doc. 110), plaintiff may then file a motion asking the court to lift the filing restrictions. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 12/7/2012. (ses)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 92 Motion for Reconsideration. Further, Defendant Frost's 106 Motion for Injunction Imposing Filing Restrictions is provisionally granted. Plaintiff may file written objections to the above propo sed filing restriction on or before 12/06/2012. Further, if the filing restrictions take effect and if the Tenth Circuit should later reverse any portion of this court's Order, plaintiff may then file a motion asking the court to lift the filing restrictions. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 11/30/2012. (mg)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 24 , 27 , ]31], 64 , and 67 Motions to Dismiss. Further, defendant Badger's 71 Motion to Remand, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss is granted and all claims against defendant Badger are dismissed. It is furth er ordered that plaintiff's 75 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, and 85 Motion for Entry of Default against defendants Jordan and Weber are denied. Mr. Gregory Lee's request for withdrawal of Substitution of Counsel as to defendants Jordan and Weber is granted, and Mr. Lee's request that this case proceed to mediation is denied as moot. Further, all remaining claims are dismissed. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 11/2/2012. (mg)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 33 Defendant Stanton A. Hazlett and Derek Schmidt's Motion to Stay Discovery. All proceedings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 for all defendants are hereby stayed until the Court rules on the three pending dispositive motions (ECF Nos. 24, 27, and 31). Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 6/18/2012. (byk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
