Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BADGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
JOHN BADGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Badger v. Monroe City Police Dept
as 21-30490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Badger
Defendant / Appellee:
Monroe City Police Department
Badger v. Monroe City Police Dept
as 3:2021cv01311
Defendant:
Police Dept City of Monroe
Plaintiff:
John Badger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Badger et al v. Progressive Pipeline Construction LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
John Badger and Melissa Badger
Defendant:
Progressive Pipeline Construction LLC , Milbar Hydro-Test Inc and Hallco Holdings LLC
Counter_claimant:
Progressive Pipeline Construction LLC
Counter_defendant:
John Badger and Melissa Badger
Cross_claimant:
Progressive Pipeline Construction LLC and Milbar Hydro-Test Inc
Cross_defendant:
Milbar Hydro-Test Inc and Progressive Pipeline Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Landrith v. Schmidt, et al
as 12-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET DAVID LANDRITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his personal capacity, DON JORDAN, former Secretary of SRS, in his personal capacity, ROB SIEDLECKI, former Secretary SRS, in his personal capacity and others
Landrith v. Schmidt, et al
as 12-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET DAVID LANDRITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his personal capacity, DON JORDAN, former Secretary of SRS, in his personal capacity, ROB SIEDLECKI, former Secretary SRS, in his personal capacity and others
Landrith v. Kansas Attorney General et al
as 2:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Bret D. Landrith
Defendant:
Kansas Attorney General , Don Jordan, Rob Siedlecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
