Budd et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS et al
| Donald E. Budd, Jr. and Central Pawn, Inc. |
| Rodney Gentry, FNU Monroe, T. Butkovich, Mark Porter, M. Johnson, Cheryl Purinton, Daniel Myers, Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS, Kansas City, Missouri, City of and Robert Deyaeghere |
| 2:2012cv02431 |
| July 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Wyandotte |
| Karen M. Humphreys |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 122 Missouri Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 128 Kansas Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/13/2014. (mss)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 10 Motio n to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Motion to Dismiss of the Kansas defendants (Dkt. 3) is granted, except as to Court 4, while the Motions to Dismiss of the Missouri defendants (Dkt. 10, 33) are granted as to the 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claim in Count 1, but otherwise denied. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 2/7/2013. (alm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
