Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Myers v. Thompson et al
as 9:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Myers
Defendant:
Dr. Thompson, Stephen Hoey, Warden of FCI Williamsburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. R.S. Dunbar
as 9:2023cv01404
Petitioner:
Matthew Daniel Myers
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PETTY v. UWCHLAND TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
JASON SCOTT PETTY and KAREN ELIZABETH JENKINS
Defendant:
UWCHLAND TOWNSHIP, OFFICIAL DANIEL MYERS and COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lamar Brown v. Courtney Barroner, et al
as 22-3354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
COURTNEY BARRONER, TAMMY FERGUSON, CHRISTOPHER FRANKS and others
Defendant:
DANIEL MYERS
COVINGTON v. MARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
AMANDA MARRIS, KENDRA BLINN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO F. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06817
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MYERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Myers v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Daniel Myers
Defendant:
Troy Reed, Andy Garden and Dr. Lockhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daniel Myers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacey v. City of Norfolk et al
as 1:2021cv00016
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Magistrate Office, Danielle Myers-Noelle and City of Norfolk
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
