Walker v. Maye

Walker v. Maye

Petitioner:	Michael John Walker
Respondent:	C. Maye
Case Number:	5:2012cv03124
Filed:	May 18, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office:	Topeka Office
County:	Leavenworth
Presiding Judge:	Richard D. Rogers
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 22, 2013	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The petition for habeas corpus is dismissed. Petitioner's motion 4 to subpoena evidence is denied as moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 1/22/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Michael John Walker by regular mail.) (smnd)
June 11, 2012	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot due to petitioner's payment of the filing fee. Petitioner shall advise the court on or before June 25, 2012, whether he filed a n administrative appeal following his receipt of the DHO reports and, if so, whether he has obtained a response. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 6/11/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Michael John Walker by regular mail.) (smnd)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 22, 2013

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The petition for habeas corpus is dismissed. Petitioner's motion 4 to subpoena evidence is denied as moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 1/22/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Michael John Walker by regular mail.) (smnd)

June 11, 2012

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot due to petitioner's payment of the filing fee. Petitioner shall advise the court on or before June 25, 2012, whether he filed a n administrative appeal following his receipt of the DHO reports and, if so, whether he has obtained a response. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 6/11/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Michael John Walker by regular mail.) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Maye
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael John Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: C. Maye
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?