Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mayes v. Banuelos, et al.
as 26-5823
Plaintiff:
QUION MAYES
Defendant:
Officer J. BANUELOS, Officer D. ZUNIGA, CITY OF RIALTO and others
Stone et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2026cv06267
Plaintiff:
John W Stone and Shirley D Stone
Defendant:
Susan M Brnovich, Kathleen Marie Hobbs, Kristin Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ilene et al v. Soho Hospitality
as 1:2026cv00692
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cozzens, Yodit Yemane, Ashley Ilene and others
Defendant:
Soho Hospitality
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ilene et al
as 1:2026cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ilene, Janet Gauzman, Danielle Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fields v. Van Voorhis et al
as 1:2026cv10287
Plaintiff:
Justin Fields
Defendant:
Kellie Van Voorhis, Gregg Donathan, Erin Posey and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Logan County et al
as 1:2026cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Mayes
Defendant:
Logan County, K-9 C. Smith, Detective Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Potter v. Meza, et al.
as 26-5396
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP POTTER
Defendant:
ALANE ORTEGA, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-60 inclusive, ROBERT MEZA and others
Barzee v. Abdulla
as 26-2338
Plaintiff:
SAIO BARZEE
Defendant:
Sing Sing Correctional Officer A.M. ABDULLA, Sing Sing Correctional Officer E. TORRES, Sing Sing Correctional Officer V. SANTIAGO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
