Otte et al v. Ash et al
| Shawn Otte, Michael Ferrara, Antwan Crosby, Juan Alfredo Lopez Amaya, Shon Jackson, Charles Clark and Larry Day |
| (fnu) (lnu) (3), Kathleen Collins, Kansas City, Kansas, City of, Tina Hunt, (fnu) (lnu) (1), Larry Roland, Donald Ash, Wyandotte County, Kansas, (fnu) (lnu) (4), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Daniel Obermeier and (fnu) (lnu) (5) |
| 5:2018cv03255 |
| September 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE to the Court (see page 2) by Plaintiff Antwan Crosby re #6 Supplement to Complaint (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: A copy of the #10 Memorandum and Order and #11 Judgment were remailed to Plaintiff Shawn Otte at El Dordo Correctional Facility. (smnd) |
| Filing 13 RETURN Mail, Refused, Unable to Forward received re #10 Memorandum and Order, addressed to Shawn Otte. Not Remailed. (ht) |
| Filing 12 RETURN mail received re #10 Memorandum and Order and #11 Judgment addressed to Plaintiff Juan Alfredo Lopez Amaya (Left Facility/Return to Sender); Not Remailed (smnd) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #10 dismissing action without prejudice. ***Terminating Case. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/02/18. Mailed to pro se party plaintiffs by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff's pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is denied as moot. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/02/18. Mailed to pro se party plaintiffs by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 9 RETURN mail received re #5 Memorandum and Order and Order to Show Cause addressed to Plaintiff Shawn Otte (Left Facility/Return to Sender); Remailed to Plaintiff Otte at El Dorado Correctional Facility (smnd) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Shawn Otte, #1020285: now at El Dorado Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 311, El Dorado, Kansas 67042 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to the Clerk by Plaintiff Antwan Crosby (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiffs Shawn Otte, Larry Day, Juan Alfredo Lopez Amaya, Antwan Crosby, Shon Jackson, Charles Clark and Michael Ferrara (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is granted until October 26, 2018 in which to show good cause in writing to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States Senior District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/5/2018. Mailed to Plaintiff Shawn Otte by regular mail. (ht)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #3 Notice of Deficiency by Plaintiff Shawn Otte (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Shawn Otte by regular mail. Response deadline 10/26/2018. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shawn Otte (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Shawn Otte (four additional plaintiffs listed, but they did not sign the complaint) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
