Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Livingston v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County, et al
as 23-3144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN D. LIVINGSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, WYANDOTTE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADAM SOKOLOFF and others
Livingston (ID 60787) v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County et al
as 5:2023cv03032
Plaintiff:
Adrian D. Livingston
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Wyandotte County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners, Adam Sokoloff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlobohm v. Ash et al
as 5:2023cv03014
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (3), Donald Ash, (fnu) Fewell and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Schlobohm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Wyandotte County, et al
as 21-3158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN CROSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
WYANDOTTE COUNTY, DONALD ASH, Wyandotte County Sheriff and LARRY ROLAND, Wyandotte County Undersheriff
Roark v. Ash et al
as 5:2021cv03075
Defendant:
Sara Toms, Rachael Draper, (fnu) Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Roark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roark v. Ash et al
as 5:2020cv03288
Defendant:
Sara Toms, (fnu) Moraw, (fnu) Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Roark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roark v. Ash et al
as 5:2020cv03267
Defendant:
Sara Toms, (fnu) Moraw, (fnu) Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Roark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson (ID 116218) v. Ash et al
as 5:2020cv03252
Defendant:
Charles Patrick, Donald Ash and Jeffrey S. Fewell
Plaintiff:
Sacharey T. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann (ID 76997) v. Fewell et al
as 5:2020cv03200
Defendant:
John Doe, J. Patrick, (fnu) Schuler and others
Plaintiff:
Durayl Vann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Sledd et al
as 5:2020cv03105
Defendant:
James Spies, Sara Toms, Bryanna Hanschu and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle J. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
