Jackson (ID 116218) v. Ash et al
| Sacharey T. Jackson |
| Charles Patrick, Donald Ash and Jeffrey S. Fewell |
| 5:2020cv03252 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson, #116218: now at Hutchinson Correctional Facility, PO Box 1568, Hutchinson, KS 67504. (jal) |
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 11/23/2020. Receipt number T4631014318, in the amount of $ 5.00. (jal) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Updated Docket Sheet re 5 Order by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson. An updated copy of the docket sheet was mailed to the Plaintiff. (jal) |
Filing 9
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #8 ) is granted and the time to submit the initial partial fee is extended to and including December 1, 2020. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/10/20. Mailed to pro se party Sacharey T. Jackson by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Continue Partial Filing Fee Deadline by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson. (jal) |
| Filing 7 RETURN Mail received re 5 Order addressed to Sacharey T. Jackson. Remailed on 10/29/2020 to Plaintiff's current address: El Dorado Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 311, El Dorado, KS 67042. (jal) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson #116218: now at El Dorado Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 311, El Dorado, KS 67042. Notice is being sent to Plaintiff Jackson stating he is incarcerated in a facility with mandatory electronic filing and should follow instructions available at the facility for transmitting pleadings electronically to the court. (jal) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $5.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including October 28, 2020, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/14/20. Mailed to pro se party Sacharey T. Jackson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Sacharey T. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Attachments 1-2, #2 Exhibits 1-10, #3 Envelopes) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
