Payton (ID 66352) v. Kansas, State of
| Walter Payton |
| Kansas, State of |
| 5:2023cv03237 |
| October 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RECORD ON APPEAL retrieved by 10CCA consisting of Volume 1 - Pleadings re #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (Appeal No. 23-3228) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
| Filing 11 APPEAL DOCKETED in 10CCA on 11/6/2023 and assigned Appeal No. 23-3228 re #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Walter Payton. (jal) |
| Filing 10 PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA re #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Packet) (jal) |
| APPEAL FEE STATUS: Filing fee not paid re: #9 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment on behalf of Petitioner Walter Payton. (THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY-NO DOCUMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION) (jal) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Memorandum & Order, #4 Judgment, #3 Memorandum & Order, by Petitioner Walter Payton. (jal) |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion to reopen (Doc. #6 ) is denied. This matter shall remain closed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/02/23. Mailed to pro se party Walter Payton by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE (titled Motion of Proof for Service) by Petitioner Walter Payton. (smnd) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Reopen Case by Petitioner Walter Payton. (smnd) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Walter Payton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT regarding #3 Memorandum and Order dismissing matter without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/30/23. Mailed to pro se party Walter Payton by regular mail. (smnd) |
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice as an unauthorized successive petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254, which the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider. Petitioner is no longer required to comply with the Notice of Deficiency. (Doc. #2 .) No certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/30/23. Mailed to pro se party Walter Payton by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Walter Payton by regular mail. Response deadline 11/29/2023. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Walter Payton. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Payton (ID 66352) v. Kansas, State of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Walter Payton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kansas, State of | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
