Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Payton (ID 66352) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03237
Petitioner:
Walter Payton
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Payton v. Mayor et al
as 3:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton
Defendant:
Mayor, Police Chief, Detectives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belk et al v. Mayor et al
as 3:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
Cameron Belk, Sr., Derek Burton, Michael M. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Mayor, Police Chief, Detectives and others
Interested Party:
Dion Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton (ID 66352) v. Kelly et al
as 5:2020cv03257
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton and Walter Peyton, Inc.
Defendant:
Alec R. Wilson, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, Nathanael S. Timm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meagher v. WALTER PAYTON POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC
as 2:2020cv11083
Plaintiff:
Michael Meagher
Defendant:
WALTER PAYTON POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Payton (ID 66352) v. Ballinger et al
as 5:2020cv03092
Defendant:
Ronald S. Trollope, Richard Ballinger, State of Kansas and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton (ID 66352) v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2017cv03177
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Richard Ballinger and Kimberly T. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. State of Kansas, et al
as 17-3107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PAYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, 18TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, JAMES FLEETWOOD, Chief Judge and others
Payton v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2017cv03049
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, 18th Judicial District Court, James Fleetwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
