Jackson v. Steele et al
| Glenn Jackson |
| John Doe, City of Grayson, Kentucky, Travis Steele, Tony Cantrell, Chris Yavorcik, Casey Brammell, George Steele and Ed Ginter |
| 0:2011cv00072 |
| July 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Ashland Office |
| Carter |
| PSO |
| Henry R. Wilhoit |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, granting 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Casey Brammell, Tony Cantrell, City of Grayson, Kentucky, Ed Ginter, George Steele, Travis Steele, Chris Yavorcik 2) pla federal and state law claims are dismissed with prejudice 3) case is stricken form active docket of this court 4) a judgment shall be entered herewith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/19/14.(SMT)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ORDER: (1) Plf's Objections DE# 34 to the Magistrate Judge's Order DE# 33 excluding Plf's expert witness Dr. George Kirkham, are hereby OVERRULED; (2) Plf shall not be allowed to designate Dr. George Kirkham as an expert witness in this matter; (3) Plf's motion DE# 35 to hold discovery in abeyance pending the Court's adjudication of his objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order is hereby DENIED AS MOOT; and (4) Any dispositive motions shall be filed NLT Monday, September 23, 2013, (See Doc. 24 ). Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/26/2013.(KSS)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
