McLaughlin v. SSA
Larry Edward McLaughlin |
SSA |
0:2013cv00054 |
April 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Ashland Office |
Elliott |
Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, 1) denying 12] MOTION for Summary Judgment by Larry Edward McLaughlin 2) granting 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by SSA ; 3) JUDGMENT in favor of dft will be contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/30/14.(SMT)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McLaughlin v. SSA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry Edward McLaughlin | |
Represented By: | William Grover Arnett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SSA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.