Angalet v. Housing Authority of Ashland et al
| Dana Gene Angalet |
| Gray Woods & Cooper, Housing Authority of Ashland and Department of Housing and Urban Development |
| 0:2013cv00146 |
| September 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Ashland Office |
| Boyd |
| Henry R. Wilhoit |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: re 1 Emergency Petition and Complaint: (1) Upon being served with process, the named defendants are required to respond to Angalet's claims that he, as a disabled person, has been the victim of unlawful discrimina tion, in violation of federal law. (2) Angalet's claims for injunctive relief from the Judgment of the Boyd District Court entered on September 20, 2013, authorizing the eviction from his apartment, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure t o state a claim for which any relief can be granted by this Court. Angalet is free to refile these same claims for injunctive relief in state court. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr. on 9/26/2013.(CMR)cc: COR; Dana Blinky Angalet via hand deli very as he called during entry of this Order and stated he was coming to obtain a copy; Copies via U.S. Mail to: Housing Authority of Ashland, Gray Woods & Cooper, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, US Attorney General and US Attorney ED/KY.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
