Borden v. Sexton
| Jason Dean Borden |
| Federal Prison Industries and Officer Sexton |
| 0:2019cv00058 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Henry R Wilhoit |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Letter from Nancy Douglas (Attachments: #1 Documents attached to letter, #2 Envelope (no postmark)) (KSS) |
Filing 13
ORDER: it is ORDERED that this action remains closed, and Borden may only proceed in accordance with the Court's previous orders. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 8/6/19.(KSS)cc: COR, Borden (via US mail)
|
| Filing 12 Letter from Nancy Douglas with additional attachments (Attachments: #1 env no pm, #2 consent to release of information and affidavit of Borden) (JLS) |
| Filing 11 Letter from Nancy Douglas with attachments (Attachments: #1 env, pm 7-19, #2 Affidavit of Borden) (JLS) |
| Filing 10 Letter from Nancy Douglas requesting correspondence be sent to her instead of Borden (Attachments: #1 env pm 7-17) (JLS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #10 Letter, #11 Letter #12 Letter, (JLS) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: 1) Borden's latest motions #6 , #7 and #8 are DENIED without prejudice and this matter remains closed; 2) as previously stated, Borden may commence a new action using the approved forms and paying the fee or complying with payment as set out herein.. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 7/15/19. (JLS)cc: COR, Borden via USMail
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to Seal a Document #6 MOTION to Clarify by Jason Dean Borden, pro se Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 cover ltr)(JLS) |
| Filing 7 MOTION For Acceptance of Brief, Background, Notice of Retaliation, etc. by Jason Dean Borden, pro seMotions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JLS) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Clarify by Jason Dean Borden, pro seMotions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 cover ltr, #2 env no pm)(JLS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER : 1) This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and STRICKEN from the docket; 2) the clerk shall send Borden a form 520, Form AO-240 and EDKy 523; 3) Borden may commence a new civil action using the Court-approved civil rights complaint. Borden must also either pay the $400 filing and administrative fee in full at time of filing, ask to pay the filing fee in installments by (a) completing AO-240, (b) having prison staff complete EDKy 523 and (c) filing both with the Court. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 7/3/19.(JLS)cc: COR, Borden via USMail
|
| Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption page)(JLS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem ad Litem by Jason Dean Borden, pro seMotions referred to P SO. (JLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by Jason Dean Borden, pro se. (Attachments: #1 env, pm 6-13-19)(JLS) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLS) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem ad Litem by Jason Dean Borden (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
