Dudley v. Streeval
| Sean Lamont Dudley |
| J. C. Streeval |
| 0:2019cv00113 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Joseph M Hood |
| P SO |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT : 1) Dudley's petition #1 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to his right to file a civil rights complaint; 2) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; 30 This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay.. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 12/2/19.(JLS)cc: COR, Dudley via USMail |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : 1) Dudley's Petition #1 is DENIED without prejudice, to Dudley's right to reassert his conditions of confinement claim; 2) The clerk SHALL SEND Dudley a civil rights complaint 9Form EDKY 520), an Affidavit of Assets/In Forma Pauperis (AO-240) and a Certificate of Inmate Account (EDKY Form 523); 3) Dudley may file a civil rights complaint regarding his conditions of confinement claims. However, he must use the court-approved and provided civil rights Complaint form. Moreover, if Dudley does file civil rights complaint, he must also either pay the $400 fee or ask to pay the filing fee in installments over time by completing the following steps: (a) completing the Affidavit (AO-240 Form); (b) having the Certificate if Inmate Account (Form 523) certified by prison staff, and (c) filing both with the Court; 4) this matter is CLOSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 12/2/19.(JLS)cc: COR, Dudley w/appropriate forms via US Mail
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0002991.), filed by Sean Lamont Dudley. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Appeal Documents, #2 Receipt, #3 Env, pm 10-31-19)(JLS) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dudley v. Streeval | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: J. C. Streeval | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Sean Lamont Dudley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
