Sapp v. Helton
| Todd A. Sapp |
| Keith Helton |
| 0:2020cv00002 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Joseph M Hood |
| Matthew A Stinnett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hood for review of #7 Response to the Court's #4 Order. (JLS) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #4 Court Order filed by Keith Helton. (Hightower, Courtney) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Return Receipt on Attorney General of Kentucky re #4 Order.(JLS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith Helton. (Hightower, Courtney) |
Filing 4
ORDER : 10 NOT 1/31/20 Sapp SHALL show cause why his 2254 should not be dismissed as untimely. Sapp shall submit a response limited to the issues of timeliness and equitable tolling by that date. Failure to provide a sufficient basis or otherwise render the petition timely, the Court will likely recommend denial; 2) The clerk shall, by certified mail, serve a copy of the Petition and this Order upon the AG of Ky; 3) Respondent shall file any response to the submission ordered in (1) above, limited to the Commonwealth's posture on petition timeliness and equitable tolling by March 2, 2020; 4) The Commonwealth shall assist the Court in fulfilling its duties under 18 3771(b)(2). To that end, the Court expects the Commonwealth to know the identity of any "victim" and to keep such person reasonably apprised of the developments and public hearings in the case. The Commonwealth shall file a notice certifying its compliance with this paragraph within 45 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 1/17/20.(JLS)cc: CORand Todd A. Sapp by US Mail, AG via certified US Mail w/enclosures
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Todd A. Sapp. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Order in prior EDKY case of Petitioner, #3 env, no pm)(JLS) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Stinnett for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sapp v. Helton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Todd A. Sapp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Keith Helton | |
| Represented By: | Courtney Jones Hightower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
