USA v. Fugett
| USA |
| Grandville Sears Fugett and Barbara Sue Fugett |
| 0:2020cv00003 |
| January 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Henry R Wilhoit |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING by USA re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Promissory Note, #2 Exhibit B: Mortgage, #3 Exhibit C: Subsidy Agreement, #4 Exhibit D: Affidavit of Kimberly Williamson (1 p.))(Lisle, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Barbara Sue Fugett, Grandville Sears Fugett; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (JLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4571923), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Promissory Note, #2 Exhibit B - Mortgage, #3 Exhibit C - Subsidy Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Kimberly Williamson, #5 Exhibit E - Bankruptcy Discharge, #6 Summons for Grandville Sears Fugett, #7 Summons for Barbara Sue Fugett, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLS) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLS) |
| Clerk's Note: re #1 Complaint, Exhibits were incomplete. Exhibits A, B, C and D only contained Page 1 of each Exhibit. Attorney shall file a Notice of Filing and attach complete exhibits with a link to the #1 Complaint. (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
