Gipson v. Southern Health Providers Staff et al
Plaintiff: Walter Gipson
Defendant: Southern Health Providers Staff and Boyd County Detention Center
Case Number: 0:2020cv00121
Filed: October 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: William O Bertelsman
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Filing 8 Letter from Walter Gipson, pro se regarding medical records. (Attachments: #1 env, pm 11-30-20) (JLS)
December 3, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #8 Letter. (JLS)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: 1) Gipson's #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/26/20. (JLS)cc: CORand Walter Gipson by US Mail
October 23, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Walter Gipson, pro se, with envelope postmarked 10/21/20. Motions referred to PSO. (KSS)
October 23, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Walter Gipson (KSS)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1) Gipson's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED and all pending motions are DENIED as moot; 2) this action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; 3) The clerk shall send Gipson (a) a EDKY 520 Form; (b) an AO 240 Form; (c) a EDKY 523 Form; 4) If Gipson wishes to file a new complaint, he must file the forms as set forth above. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/13/20.(JLS)cc: CORand Walter Gipson by US Mail
October 9, 2020 Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Walter Gipson, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Account Stmt)(JLS)
October 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge PSO, filed by Walter Gipson, pro se. (Attachments: #1 env, no pm)(JLS)
October 9, 2020 Conflict Check run. (JLS)
October 9, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Walter Gipson (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gipson v. Southern Health Providers Staff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Health Providers Staff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boyd County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Gipson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?