Ferguson v. Adams
Petitioner: Alger Ferguson
Respondent: Brad Adams
Case Number: 0:2020cv00127
Filed: October 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: Joseph M Hood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd D. Ferguson on behalf of Brad Adams (Ferguson, Todd)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RETURN of Service for certified mail sent to Warden Adams, pursuant to #6 . (JLS)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Attorney General of Kentucky re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (JLS)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1) Petitioner's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and he shall be required to pay the filing fee w/i 30 days; 2) a copy of the #1 Petition SHALL be served by certified mail upon the Respondent, Warden Adams and the AG of the Commonwealth; 3) Respondent SHALL answer the petition w/i 60 days from date of service; 4) the answer SHALL (a) address the transcripts as set out herein; (b) include any brief of petition in any appellate court; (c) any brief from prosecution in any appellate court; (d) include any opinions or dispositions; 5) the parties SHALL serve each other copies of any further pleadings; 6) Petition SHALL keep the clerk informed of his current mailing address and failure to do so may result in dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 10/30/20. (JLS)cc: CORand Alger Ferguson by US Mail
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alger Ferguson, pro se. (JLS)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alger Ferguson, pro se.Motions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (JLS)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Alger Ferguson, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 env, no pm)(JLS)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (JLS)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Atkins for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alger Ferguson, pro se. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferguson v. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brad Adams
Represented By: Todd D. Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alger Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?