Martin v. Beard et al
Donald Lynn Martin |
H. Allen Beard and David LeMaster |
0:2021cv00050 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P SO |
Henry R Wilhoit |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KSS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Donald Lynn Martin, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit B Resolution Attempt, #3 Exhibit C-Indictment, #4 Exhibit D-Risk Scoring, #5 Exhibit E-Diplomas, #6 Exhibit F-TRULINCS Account, #7 Exhibit G-File Maintenance Document, #8 Exhibit J-Administrative Remedy Documents, #9 Envelopes both postmarked 5-20-2021)(KSS) Modified on 5/25/2021 to reflect NO FILING FEE RECEIVED (KSS). |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Donald Lynn Martin, pro se. (KSS) |
Conflict Check run. (KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.