Woods v. LeMaster
Petitioner: Steven J. Woods
Respondent: LeMaster
Case Number: 0:2022cv00052
Filed: July 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Referring Judge: P SO
2 Judge: Henry R Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 USCA Case Number 22-5700 Case Manager Jennifer A. Strobel for #8 Notice of Appeal filed by Steven J. Woods. (KSS)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: ORDERED that this matter, previously assigned to United States District Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., is REASSIGNED to Chief United States District Judge Danny C. Reeves for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/10/22.(KSS)cc: CORand Woods by US Mail
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Judgment by Steven J. Woods, pro se, with envelope postmarked 8/8/22. (SHORT RECORD MAILED). cc: COR, 6CCA (KSS)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (KSS)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT : 1) the Court ENTERS Judgment in favor of the Respondent; 2) this is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 7/25/22.(JLS)cc: CORand Steven J. Woods by US Mail
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : 1) Wood's #1 Petition is DENIED; 2) this action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 7/25/22.(JLS)cc: CORand Steven J. Woods by US Mail
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KSS)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Habeas Filing Fee Filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 59 (KSS)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (KSS)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (KSS)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Steven J. Woods, pro se. (Received in envelope with Petition DE 1)(KSS)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Steven J. Woods, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy Documents, #2 Certified Mail Envelope)(KSS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woods v. LeMaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven J. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LeMaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?