Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC v. TLP Construction, LLC et al
| Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC |
| TLP Construction, LLC, Phillip Thompson and James Lewis |
| 0:2023cv00036 |
| March 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| David L Bunning |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Summons Reissued as to Phillip Thompson, TLP Construction, LLC and returned to counsel electronically for service. (KSS) |
| Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC as to TLP Construction, LLC. (Yocum, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC as to Phillip Thompson. (Yocum, Thomas) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO Thomas Yocum re #10 Notice of Filing of Summons for Issuance. Clerk is unable to issue summons presented at DE #10 as original summons issued at DE [#] have not been returned. Within 7 calendar days, complete the summons returned unexecuted section of the declaration of service on the original summons issued at DE #8 and file the return using the event "Summons Returned." cc: COR (KSS) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Summons Request of Clerk signature to reissue summons after failure of first attempt)(Yocum, Thomas) |
| NOTICE OF FEE REFUND APPROVED re #6 Request for Fee Refund ; the fee transaction involving Receipt No. AKYEDC5514899 having been erroneously paid, the Clerk APPROVES the refund by processing a credit through the electronic credit card system. The credit refund transaction in the amount of $402.00 was successfully completed on 4/13/23 at 7:50 a.m.cc: COR (JLS) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC via in-person delivery to James Lewis served on 3/31/2023, answer due 4/21/2023. (Yocum, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to James Lewis, Phillip Thompson, TLP Construction, LLC; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically. (JLS) |
| Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Wesco Distribution, Inc. for Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC.. (Yocum, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR FEE REFUND TO CREDIT CARD by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC re #1 Complaint . (Yocum, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Yocum, Thomas) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Finance for review: #6 Request for Fee Refund. (JLS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Thomas Yocum. #1 Complaint has been filed by Atlanta Electrical Distributors, LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (KSS) |
Filing 3
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Ashland to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this court to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/15/22 (KSS)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $402; receipt number BKYEDC-5514899), filed by Atlanta Electrial Distributors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Promissory Note, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KSS) |
| Conflict Check run. (KSS) |
| NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO UPDATE ADDRESS to Thomas Yocum: It appears the address listed on your filing #1 Complaint is different than the address registered with our Court. Pursuant to the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures governing ECF, a request to update your address must be processed through your PACER account. Please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information or contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR (KSS) |
| NOTICE FOR ATTORNEY TO UPDATE ADDRESS to Julie A. Neuroth: It appears the address listed on your filing #1 Complaint is different than the address registered with our Court. Pursuant to the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures governing ECF, a request to update your address must be processed through your PACER account. Please visit the Court's website at www.kyed.uscourts.gov for information or contact the Help Desk at 1-866-485-6349. cc: COR (KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
