McNichols v. Armark Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant: Armark Corporation, Theresa Gutett and Adam Bare
Case Number: 0:2023cv00073
Filed: June 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT : 1) the #1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/7/23.(JLS)cc: CORand Charles Raymond McNichols by US Mail
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : 1) the #1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; 2) this matter is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/7/23.(JLS)cc: CORand Charles Raymond McNichols by US Mail
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS)
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Charles Raymond McNichols, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Summary)(JLS)
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Raymond McNichols, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (JLS)
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge PSO, filed by Charles Raymond McNichols, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Order of Dismissal from Civil Action 0:23-cv-63-DLB)(JLS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2023: #2 env, pm 6-23-23) (JLS).
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (JLS)
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Raymond McNichols, pro se. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNichols v. Armark Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Raymond McNichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armark Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Gutett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Bare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?