Hulse v. LeMaster
| Cory Hulse |
| David LeMaster |
| 0:2023cv00084 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Letter from Cory Hulse, pro se, with envelope postmarked 10/16/23 re: certificate of service (KSS)
|
|
CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE TO Cory Hulse re #9 Letter : In response to your request for the Clerk to send a copy of your filing to the defendant, please be advised unless the court orders the Clerk to provide service you are responsible for serving any parties entitled to notice. You will be notified once the defendant has filed a response in your case. cc: Cory Hulse by US Mail (KSS)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Warden, FCI Ashland re #6 Order. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Attorney's Office re #6 Order. (JLS)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER : 1) the clerk shall send #1 the petition and this Order via certified mail to (a) Respondent LeMaster and (b) the US Attorney for the EDKY; 2) W/I 60 days the respondent shall file a response to the Petition; 3) W/I 30 days after the response is filed, Hulse may file a reply brief; 4) Once the foregoing time periods have passed, Hulse's #1 Petition shall stand submitted for a decision.. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 9/13/23.(JLS)cc: COR, Respondent LeMaster and USA by certified mailand Cory Hulse by US Mail
|
|
Filing 5
Filing fee Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 520 (JLS)
|
|
Filing 4
HABEAS filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 522 (KSS)
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KSS)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (KSS)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Filing Fee Received (KSS)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #5 Filing Fee Received (JLS)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Cory Hulse, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy Documents, #2 Form BP 199, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Certified Mail Envelope)(KSS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hulse v. LeMaster | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Cory Hulse | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: David LeMaster | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
