Baker v. Green
| Eugene Lamont Baker |
| James David Green |
| 0:2023cv00110 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Note: Case transferred from Kentucky Eastern has been opened in Western District of Kentucky as case 3:24-cv-00017, filed 01/09/2024. (KSS) |
| Clerk's Note re #6 Order: Case extracted and electronicallytransmitted to the USDC/KYWD via CM/ECF.(CBD) |
Filing 6
ORDER: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge DE #5 is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court; (2) Petitioner Baker's petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 DE #1 is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division; and (3) This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/7/24.(KSS)cc: CORand Baker by US Mail
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Bunning for review: re #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eugene Lamont Baker (KSS) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division. Objections to R&R due by 12/18/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 11/30/23.(KSS)cc: CORand Baker by US Mail |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Smith for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (KSS) |
| Conflict Check run. (KSS) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eugene Lamont Baker Motions referred to Candace J. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(KSS) |
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KSS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eugene Lamont Baker, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Information Packet, #3 Envelope postmarked 11-15-23)(KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baker v. Green | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eugene Lamont Baker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James David Green | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
