Sneed v. Airmark et al
Plaintiff: Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant: Airmark, Department of Corrections, Little Sandy Correctional Complex and The Commonwealth of Kentucky
Case Number: 0:2024cv00026
Filed: March 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2024 Filing 6 JUDGMENT : this matter is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/7/24.(JLS)cc: CORand Robert Edward Sneed by US Mail
March 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: (1) Plaintiff Sneed's complaint DE 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. (2) This matter is STRICKEN from the docket. (3) The Clerk of Court shall send Sneed the following blank forms: (a) EDKY 520 (b) AO240 (c) EDKY 523. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/7/24.(JLS)cc: CORand Robert Edward Sneed, w/ forms by US Mail
March 4, 2024 Filing 4 Letter from Robert Edward Sneed, pro se. (Attachments: #1 env, pm 2-26-24) (JLS)
March 4, 2024 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS)
March 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge, filed by Robert Edward Sneed, pro se. (Attachments: #1 env, pm 2-26-24)(JLS)
March 4, 2024 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (JLS)
March 4, 2024 Conflict Check run. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sneed v. Airmark et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Edward Sneed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Airmark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Commonwealth of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?