Easley v. Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services LLC et al
| Eric Easley |
| Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services LLC and Chase Keffer |
| 0:2024cv00052 |
| May 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| David L Bunning |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) This matter be referred to US Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. 2) the Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved as set out herein. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/15/22.(KSS)cc: COR
|
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services LLC identifying Other Affiliate Giant Industries, Inc., Other Affiliate MPC Investment LLC, Other Affiliate Marathon Petroleum Corporation, Other Affiliate Marathon Petroleum Company LP for Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services LLC.. (KSS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Boyd Circuit Court, Case Number 24-CI-00293. (Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-5834834), filed by Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services, LLC, Chase Keffer. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KSS) |
| Conflict Check run. (KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
