Davis et al v. Kenton County Clerk's Office et al
Donna Jean Wood, Ricole Neal, Ruth Thornsburg, Virginia Wafford, Cynthia Sue Johnson and Lois Davis |
Kenton County Clerk's Office, Rodney Eldridge and Kenton County Fiscal Court |
2:2007cv00067 |
March 28, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Covington Office |
Kenton |
William O. Bertelsman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER; 1)Def's, Eldridge's 23 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment directed toward plas Virginia Wafford and Donna Wood are denied in part as to the 42:1983 claim and granted in part as to the tort of outrage claim; 2)Pla's 35 Motion to Strike Affidavit of Eldridge is granted in part as to the non-political reasons for his refusal to rehire the plas and denied in part as to Eldridge's statements regarding his plans f or altering the duties of the positions at issue; 3)Pla's 36 Motion to Strike Kenton County Fiscal Court's memorandum on the issue of Kenton County is denied; 4)Case set for Final Pretrial Conference on 12/10/2009 at 1:00pm before Judge Wi lliam O. Bertlesman in Covington. Court's standard final pretrial order shal enter concurrently; 5)Case is set for Jury Trial on 1/4/2010 at 10:00AM before Judge William O. Bertlesman in Covington.. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 06/16/2009. (LST)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.