Seaman et al v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
| Derek Seaman, Stefanie Seaman and Margie Brammeier |
| Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company |
| 2:2009cv00077 |
| June 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Mason |
| David L. Bunning |
| Both |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Pltf Brammeier's motion for summary judgment 109 is denied; and 2) Deft's motion for summary judgment 112 is granted; and 3) A separate judgment will be issued herewith. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman on 6/9/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER: 1) Pltfs Derek and Stefanie Seaman's notice of voluntary dismissal 117 is denied to the extent it is construed as a motion to voluntarily dismiss their claims without prejudice; 2) Deft's motion to d ismiss all calims brought by Derek and Stefanie Seaman 116 is granted. The claims of Derek and Stefanie Seaman are hereby dismissed with prejudice as a sanction for their refusal to participate in discovery, and pursuant to Rule 41(b) . Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman on 12/3/2010. (ECO)cc: COR, cc mailed by regular U.S. Main to Pltfs Derek Seaman and Stefanie Seaman this date. Modified text to correctly describe document and to add cc mailed to Pltfs on 12/3/2010 (ECO).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
