Dauwe et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Dauwe and SSA
Case Number: 2:2010cv00083
Filed: April 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; 1)Pla's 17 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 2)Pla is not awarded attorney's fees; 3)However, pla is awarded $415.00 in COSTS, payable directly to the pla - assuming the pla does not owe anything to the United States Treasury. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 02/08/2011. (LST)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dauwe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Dauwe
Represented By: Shoshana R. Pehowic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?