Schilling et al v. Kenton County, Kentucky et al
Joel Schilling, Charles Schulker and John Telek |
Kenton County, Kentucky, Kenton County Fiscal Court, Terry Carl, Baldwin, Unknown Deputy Jailers 1-10, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Ron Waldridge, Shawnee and John or Jane Does 1-10 |
2:2010cv00143 |
July 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Covington Office |
Kenton |
David L. Bunning |
Candace J. Smith |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; 1)Defs' 55 Motion for Summary Judgment and 59 Motion for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; 2)Pla's federal claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PRJEUDICE; 3)The Court declines to exercise supplemental j urisdiction; therefore, Plas' state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3); 4)Matter is STRICKEN from the docket of the Court; 5)A Judgment in favor of Defs will be entered contemporaneously. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/17/2013. (LST)cc: COR |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; (1)Defs, Kenton County, Kenton County Fiscal Court, Terry Carl and Deputy Baldwin's 8 Motion to Dismiss Class Allegations and Claims is GRANTED; 2)Pla's class allegations are STRICKEN from the 1 Complaint. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 01/27/2011. (LST)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.