Mattingly et al v. Chartis Claims, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: J. Basil Mattingly, Bas Mattingly Master, LLC and J. Basil Mattingly Family Dynasty Trust
Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Chartis Claims, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00048
Filed: March 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Mason
Presiding Judge: William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge: Candace J. Smith
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MINUTE ENTRY for oral argument held on 9/15/2011 before Judge William O. Bertelsman: It is ordered 1) Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Remand be and hereby is GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED TO THE MASON CIRCUIT COURT; a nd 2) Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss be and is hereby DENIED. (Court Reporter Joan Averdick.). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 9/20/2011. (TED)cc: COR, certified copy of Order and Docket Sheet sent to Mason Circuit Court Clerk, Mason County Justice Center, 100 W. Third Street, Maysville, KY 41056
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mattingly et al v. Chartis Claims, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Represented By: Scott R. Brown
Represented By: Michael E. Nitardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chartis Claims, Inc.
Represented By: Scott R. Brown
Represented By: Michael E. Nitardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. Basil Mattingly
Represented By: Matthew T. Sanning
Represented By: Douglas A. Rubel
Represented By: David R. Johanson
Represented By: Marcia E. Cook
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Schumacher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bas Mattingly Master, LLC
Represented By: Marcia E. Cook
Represented By: David R. Johanson
Represented By: Douglas A. Rubel
Represented By: Matthew T. Sanning
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Schumacher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. Basil Mattingly Family Dynasty Trust
Represented By: Marcia E. Cook
Represented By: David R. Johanson
Represented By: Douglas A. Rubel
Represented By: Matthew T. Sanning
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Schumacher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?