Burgos et al v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.
| Olgarina Burgos, Deshina De La Cruz and Dania Gallegos |
| Bob Evans Farms, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv00055 |
| March 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Boone |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Candace J. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ordered 1) Defendant Bob Evans Farms, Inc.'s 14 Motion to Sever the Plaintiffs' action is GRANTED; 2) The action filed by Plaintiffs Olgarina Burgos and Deshina de la Cruz shall retain Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-0055-DCR. Within fourteen days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the plaintiffs may amend their complaint to remove allegations relating to Dania Gallegos; 3) Clerk of the Court shall assign the next case number to Plaintiff Dania Gallegos. The Clerk of Court shall further advise counsel of the new case number assigned; however the matter shall remain assigned to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge. Further no additional filing fee shall be required. Within 14 d ays of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff Dania Gallegos shall file an Amended Complaint for the purpose of removing allegations relating to plaintiffs Olgarina Burgos and Deshina de la Cruz. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 9/28/2011. (TED)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
