Doe et al v. Walton Verona Board of Education et al
Janie Doe, John Doe and Elizabeth Doe |
Don Trame, Walton Verona Board of Education, Kentucky High School Athletic Association, Vance Sullivan, Bill Boyle, Dan Sullivan, Mark Krummen, John Anderson and Kyle Bennett |
2:2011cv00171 |
August 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Covington Office |
Boone |
William O. Bertelsman |
Candace J. Smith |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 154 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Dan Sullivan's motion for summary judgment 120 is granted; 2) Motion for summary judgment of Bill Boyle, Mark Krummen, Dan Trame, Kyle Bennett on Ptffs' § 1983 claims 123 is granted; 3) Motion for summary judgment of Walton Verona Bd of Ed on Ptffs' Title IX claim 123 is DENIED; 4) Janie Doe's and Vance Sullivan's motions for partial summary judgment [100, 114] is granted; 5) Defs' joint motion for leave to file supplemental authority 147 is granted; 6) The U.S. Mag Judge is directed to commence mediation as soon as practical. A report of the result of said mediation shall be made to the Court no later than 10/15/2013. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 8/16/2013.(TJZ)cc: COR |
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Deft Vance Sullivan's motion for abstention of exercise of supplemental jurisdiction 56 is DENIED. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 9/24/2012.(ECO)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.