Boggess v. Eli Lilly & Company, Inc. et al
| Betty Boggess |
| Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Brenn Distribution, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Generics Bidco I, LLC, Generics International (US), Inc., Eli Lilly & Company, Inc., Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vintage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vintage Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt, Inc. and Mallinckrodt, LLC |
| 2:2011cv00359 |
| December 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT ELI LILLY AND COMPANY'S SECOND MASTER MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; 1)Def, Eli Lilly and Company's Second Master Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (MDL Record No. 1537, 60 in 2:11-cv -359-DCR, 63 in 2:11-cv-372-DCR, 58 in 2:11-cv-379-DCR, 26 in 2:11-cv-399-DCR, 19 in 2:12-cv-62-DCR, and 13 in 2:12-cv-65-DCR is GRANTED; 2)Claims asserted by the plaintiffs against Defendant Eli Lilly and Company in the above-captioned cases are DISMISSED, w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/31/2012.Associated Cases: 2:11-md-02226-DCR et al.(LST)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
