Estes v. C&B Marine, LLC

Plaintiff: Holly Estes
Defendant: C&B Marine, LLC
Case Number: 2:2012cv00051
Filed: February 10, 2012
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Covington Office
County: Kenton
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Referring Judge: Candace J. Smith
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46:688
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 27, 2013 112 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Cross-Defendant GCM's Motion for Summary Judgment 102 is DENIED. Carmeuse's Motion for Oral Argument 106 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/27/2013.(TJZ)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estes v. C&B Marine, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holly Estes
Represented By: Delana S. Sanders
Represented By: Patrick K. Bader
Represented By: Robert E. Sanders
Represented By: Nelson G. Wolff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C&B Marine, LLC
Represented By: Megan C. Ahrens
Represented By: Todd M. Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.