El v. Sherrod
Plaintiff: Sheba El
Defendant: Kattie Louise Sherrod
Case Number: 2:2012cv00079
Filed: March 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Kenton
Presiding Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER; 1)The 2 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 4 application to proceed in forma pauperis are GRANTED; 2)Motions filed on behalf of the Def, 3 and 5 are DENIED as improperly filed; 3)Complaint is DISMISSED, w/out prejudice. Matter is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/22/2012.(LST)cc: COR, PLA via U.S. Mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: El v. Sherrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheba El
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kattie Louise Sherrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?