Deinlein v. United States of America

Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: In Re: Estate of Audrey Deinlein
Case Number: 2:2013cv00045
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Covington Office
County: Campbell
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Referring Judge: J. Gregory Wehrman
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; 1)United States 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; 2)The Estate's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; 3)Judgment to be entered. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/23/2014. (LST)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deinlein v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Andrew Charles Strelka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: In Re: Estate of Audrey Deinlein
Represented By: J. David Bender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.