Cody v. SSA
Plaintiff: Raymond Anthony Cody
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 2:2013cv00176
Filed: October 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Kenton
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; 1)Pla's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 2)Def's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 3)Administrative decision of Administrative Law Judge Dwight D. Wilkerson will be AFFIRMED by separate Judgment entered this date. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/25/2014. (LST)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cody v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Anthony Cody
Represented By: William G. Knoebel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Represented By: John S. Osborn, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?