Ackermann Enterprises, Inc. et al v. City of Bellevue, Kentucky et al
| Ackermann Enterprises, Inc., Harbor Greene Residential, LLC and Harbor Greene Commercial, LLC |
| City of Bellevue, Kentucky and City of Bellevue, Kentucky Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency Public Properties Corporation |
| 2:2014cv00207 |
| December 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Campbell |
| William O. Bertelsman |
| J. Gregory Wehrman |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ordered 1) Ackermanns motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, to certify the Courts Order of August 24, 2016, for interlocutory appeal, R. 118, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Ackermanns motion is GRANTED as to Ackermanns breach-of-contract claims against the City. Ackermanns motion is DENIED as to (1) Ackermanns inverse-condemnation and takings claims and (2) Ackermanns request to certify the Courts prior order, R. 102, for interlocutory app eal; 2) The Courts Order of August 24, 2016, R. 102, is hereby modified and amended to DENY IN PART the Citys motion for summary judgment, R. 69, insofar as it seeks summary judgment on Ackermanns breach-of-contract claims. The Courts prior order, R. 102, remains in effect in all other respects. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 9/19/2016.(TED)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) The City's motion for summary judgment 69 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The City's motion is GRANTED as to Ackermann's breach of contract claims and as to Ackermann's Fi fth Amendment due process claim. In all other respects, the City's motion is DENIED. 2) Ackermann's motion for summary judgment 76 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Ackermann's motion is GRANTED as to the City's claims against Harbor Greene Residential. In all other respects, Ackermann's motion is DENIED. 3) The City's motion for summary judgment on its breach of contract claims 93 is DENIED. 4) Ackermann's Fifth Amendment takings and state inverse-condemnation claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 8/24/2016.(TJZ)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
