Taylor v. Lusardi

Taylor v. Lusardi

Plaintiff:	King Taylor
Defendant:	Michael Lusardi
Case Number:	2:2016cv00174
Filed:	September 23, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Covington Office
County:	Kenton
Presiding Judge:	David L. Bunning
Presiding Judge:	P SO
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 21, 2019	Filing 69 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 67 are OVERRULED; (2) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 62 is ADOPTED as the fi ndings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; (3) The Defendant's Motion for Sanctions 54 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; (4) The Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Discovery Request and or Interrogatories Production 59 ) is DENIED; (5) This matter be and is hereby DISMISSED AND STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; and (6) A separate Judgment will be filed concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/21/2019.(ECO)cc: COR w/copy mailed to King S. Taylor, pro se at address listed on the docket sheet.
February 26, 2018	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:(1) Plaintiff King Taylors Motion to Amend his Complaint 13 is granted and the Clerk of the Court shall file Taylors proposed Amended Complaint [13-2] into the record as his First Amended Complaint; (2) Defendant Michael Lusardis Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 11 (3) The referral of this matter to the Pro Se Law Office is hereby rescinded; (4) This matter is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), including the p reparation of a report and recommendation on any dispositive motions; and (5) In connection with such reference, the said Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold all hearings as may be required, and to r ule on non-dispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). See Brown v. Wesleys Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1985). Motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. Subject to other provis ions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless the parties consent to trial by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 02/26/2018.(KRB)cc: COR, King Taylor via US Mail

Date Filed

Document Text

November 21, 2019

Filing 69 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 67 are OVERRULED; (2) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 62 is ADOPTED as the fi ndings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; (3) The Defendant's Motion for Sanctions 54 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; (4) The Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Discovery Request and or Interrogatories Production 59 ) is DENIED; (5) This matter be and is hereby DISMISSED AND STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; and (6) A separate Judgment will be filed concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/21/2019.(ECO)cc: COR w/copy mailed to King S. Taylor, pro se at address listed on the docket sheet.

February 26, 2018

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:(1) Plaintiff King Taylors Motion to Amend his Complaint 13 is granted and the Clerk of the Court shall file Taylors proposed Amended Complaint [13-2] into the record as his First Amended Complaint; (2) Defendant Michael Lusardis Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 11 (3) The referral of this matter to the Pro Se Law Office is hereby rescinded; (4) This matter is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), including the p reparation of a report and recommendation on any dispositive motions; and (5) In connection with such reference, the said Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold all hearings as may be required, and to r ule on non-dispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). See Brown v. Wesleys Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1985). Motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of this Court to the undersigned. Subject to other provis ions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless the parties consent to trial by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 02/26/2018.(KRB)cc: COR, King Taylor via US Mail

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Lusardi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: King Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Lusardi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?