Virgil v. City of Newport et al
| William Virgil |
| City of Newport, Cityof Cincinnati, City of Norwood, Mark Brandt, Norm Wagner, Pat Moore, Howard Niemeier, Sarah Desentry, Bradford, Ken Page, Tom Fromme, Rick Sears, Mike Slayback, Robert Cardone, Mike Phillips and Steve Daniels |
| 2:2016cv00224 |
| December 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Boone |
| David L. Bunning |
| Candace J. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
351
MEMORANDUM ORDER: 1) Plaintiff William Virgil's Motion for Certificate of appealability 346 is GRANTED; 2) The claims dismissed on the merits in the Courts Order granting partial summary judgment 293 are hereby CERTIFIED FOR IMMEDIATE APPELLATE REVIEW. A Judgment will be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 9/30/2021.(TJZ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
345
MEMORANDUM & ORDER(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration 297 is DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Appeal as Frivolous 300 is DENIED; (3) The City of Newports Motion to Stay 301 is GRANTED; (4) The Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for August 12, 2021 and Jury Trial scheduled for August 23, 2021 are VACATED; (5) The Motions in Limine filed on July 22, 2021 are HELD IN ABEYANCE pending resolution of the Individual Newport Defendants interlocutory appeal; and (6) Not later than August 6, 2021, Plaintiff and the City of Newport may file motions to certify the Courts June 24, 2021 Memorandum Opinion and Order for interlocutory appeal. Any responses shall be filed within ten (10) days thereafter. Any replies shall be filed five (5) days thereafter.. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/27/21.(KRB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
293
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:(1) Defendants City of Cincinnati and Robert Cardone, Mike Phillips, and Mike Slaybacks Motion for Summary Judgment 215 is GRANTED; (2) Defendants City of Norwood and Steve Daniels Motion for Summary Judgment 216 is GR ANTED; (3) Defendant City of Newports Motion for Summary Judgment 223 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (4) Individual Newport Defendants Robert Bradford, Marc Brandt, Sarah Desentz, Tom Fromme, Pat Moore, Howard Niemeier, Rick Sears, and Norm an Wagners Motion for Summary Judgment 212 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. (5) The Individual Newport Defendants Motion to Strike 284 is GRANTED; and (6) Plaintiff William Virgils claims against Defendants City of Cincinnati, Robert Cardone, Mike Phillips, Mike Slayback, City of Norwood, Steve Daniels, Ken Page Robert Bradford, Sarah Desentz, Tom Fromme, Pat Moore, Howard Niemeier, and Rick Sears are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/24/21.(KRB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendants City of Norwood and Steve Danielss Motion to Dismiss 67 is GRANTED as to Count Two (§ 1983 malicious prosecution), Count Three (§ 1983 fabrication of evidence), Count Five (§ 1983 failure t o intervene), Count Six (§ 1983 conspiracy), Count Nine (negligent supervision), Count Ten (intentional infliction of emotional distress), and Count Eleven (respondeat superior), and DENIED as to Count One (§ 1983 due process); (2) Defendan t City of Newports Motion to Dismiss 70 is GRANTED as to Count Ten (intentional infliction of emotional distress) and Count Eleven (respondeat superior), and DENIED as to Count Seven (§ 1983 municipal liability) and Count Nine (negligent super vision); (3) Defendants Robert Bradford, Marc Brandt, Sarah Desentz, Tom Fromme, Pat Moore, Howard Niemeier, Rick Sears, and Norm Wagners Motion to Dismiss 75 is GRANTED as to Count Four (§ 1983 supervisor liability) and Count Ten (intentional infliction of emotional distress), and DENIED as to Count One (§ 1983 due process), Count Six (§ 1983 conspiracy).. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 01/09/2018.(KRB)cc: COR,
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
