Mullikin v. Palmer
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Mullikin
Defendant: Michael Palmer
Case Number: 2:2017cv00231
Filed: December 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Presiding Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Mullikin's Complaint (Doc. # 1 -1) is DISMISSED, with prejudice; 2) The Court will enter an appropriate judgment; and 3) This matter is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 2/14/2018.(ECO)cc: COR w/copy of MOO to Jason Lee Mullikin, pro se, via U.S. Mail at address listed on the docket sheet.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mullikin v. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Mullikin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?